Back to home

Kimi vs Cursor

Kimi (Moonshot AI) vs Cursor (Anysphere) — scored across 9 dimensions by our editorial team. Last reviewed 2026-05-09 and 2026-05-26.

Kimi

Moonshot AI

8.5

Chinese AI assistant famous for its 2M+ token context window and document chat.

Pick Kimi over Cursor if you need: Long-document chat or Chinese-language work.

Cursor

Anysphere

9.2

An AI-first IDE built around agentic coding, multi-file edits and inline chat.

Pick Cursor over Kimi if you need: Agentic coding or Refactoring.

Full comparison table

Dimension
Kimi
Moonshot AI
Cursor
Anysphere
Basics
Company
Moonshot AI
Anysphere
Released
2023-10-09
2023-03-14
Latest Version
Kimi K2
Cursor 1.x
Capabilities
Text Generation
9.0
8.0
Code Generation
8.0
10.0
Image Understanding
7.0
7.0
Web Browsing
9.0
7.0
Multimodal
7.0
7.0
Long Context
10.0
9.0
Reasoning
8.0
9.0
Fit
Best Use Cases
Long-document chatChinese-language workResearch
Agentic codingRefactoringCodebase Q&A
Best For
Chinese-speaking professionalsResearchersWriters
Indie developersStartup engineersAI tinkerers
Pricing
Free Tier
Generous free chat
Hobby: limited slow requests
Paid Plan
Kimi+: ¥99/month
Pro: $20/month
API Pricing
From ¥12/M input tokens
Bring your own key (Claude/GPT)
Enterprise
Custom
Business $40/user
Benchmarks
MMLU Score
84
86
HumanEval (Coding)
86
92
GSM8K (Math)
90
90
Context Window
2.0M tokens
200K tokens
Languages
English
medium
high
Chinese
high
medium
Multilingual
medium
medium
Editorial
Overall Score
8.5
9.2
Value for Money
9.5
8.8
Accuracy
8.5
9.0
Ease of Use
9.0
9.0

Compare another pair

Disclosure: this page does not contain paid placements. Scores are editorial. See our editorial policy.

Comments (0)

You have already commented on this page.

No comments yet. Be the first!