Back to home

DeepSeek vs Claude

DeepSeek (DeepSeek) vs Claude (Anthropic) — scored across 9 dimensions by our editorial team. Last reviewed 2026-05-19 and 2026-05-22.

DeepSeek

DeepSeek

8.9

Open-weights Chinese AI lab with strong reasoning at a fraction of GPT pricing.

Pick DeepSeek over Claude if you need: Coding or Math.

Claude

Anthropic

9.4

A thoughtful, safety-focused assistant favoured for long-form writing and code.

Pick Claude over DeepSeek if you need: Long-form writing or Coding.

Full comparison table

Dimension
DeepSeek
DeepSeek
Claude
Anthropic
Basics
Company
DeepSeek
Anthropic
Released
2023-11-29
2023-03-14
Latest Version
DeepSeek V3.2 / R2
Claude 4.5 Sonnet
Capabilities
Text Generation
9.0
10.0
Code Generation
9.0
10.0
Image Understanding
7.0
8.0
Web Browsing
8.0
7.0
Multimodal
7.0
8.0
Long Context
9.0
10.0
Reasoning
9.0
9.0
Fit
Best Use Cases
CodingMathReasoningCost-sensitive deployments
Long-form writingCodingDocument analysisResearch
Best For
DevelopersChinese-speaking usersAPI cost-optimisers
WritersDevelopersResearchersLawyers
Pricing
Free Tier
Free chat
Limited Claude 4.5 Sonnet access
Paid Plan
Free chat
Pro: $20/month
API Pricing
From $0.27/M input tokens
From $3/M input tokens (Sonnet)
Enterprise
Custom
Team $25/user, Enterprise custom
Benchmarks
MMLU Score
88
89
HumanEval (Coding)
91
94
GSM8K (Math)
95
96
Context Window
128K tokens
200K tokens
Languages
English
high
high
Chinese
high
medium
Multilingual
medium
high
Editorial
Overall Score
8.9
9.4
Value for Money
10.0
9.0
Accuracy
8.8
9.5
Ease of Use
8.0
9.0

Compare another pair

Disclosure: this page does not contain paid placements. Scores are editorial. See our editorial policy.

Comments (0)

You have already commented on this page.

No comments yet. Be the first!